FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
(FAQ)
SPECIAL VALUATION ISSUE
(WITH PARTICULAR EMPHASIS ON ISSUES RELATING
TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY SITUATIONS)
[ Section I ] [ Section II ] [ Section III ] [ Section IV ] [ Section V ] [ Section VI ] [ Section VII ] [ Section VIII ] [ Section IX ] [ Section X ]
Ans: The ACV contains no definition of ‘sale’. However,
the term ‘sale’ has to be interpreted in the widest sense, keeping in view the
provisions contained in Articles 1 and 8 of the ACV. The Technical
Committee on Customs Valuation has prepared a list of cases that would not be
deemed to constitute ‘sales’ meeting the requirements and conditions of Article
1 and 8 of the Code. In such cases, one of the methods other than the
transaction value method has to be applied proceeding sequentially. The list is
not exhaustive:
(i)
Free consignments: Where
transactions do not involve payment of any price, they cannot be regarded as
sales. Examples of such transactions are gifts, samples, promotional items.
(ii)
Goods imported on
consignment: Under this arrangement the goods are imported not as a result
of sale but for subsequent sale on the account of the supplier. As such, there
is no sale the time of importation.
Importation on consignment for subsequent auction sale is an example of
such transaction. Such importations on consignment are to be distinguished from
profit-sharing transactions. In the case of the latter, the goods are sold
Provisionally at a price to which part of the profit arising out of subsequent
sale in the country of importation has to be added.
(iii)
Goods imported by
intermediaries who do not produce the goods: Under this arrangement, goods
are delivered to an intermediary who imports the same, acting as an agent of
the supplier, and sells it later on, on the supplier's account and risk.
Importation for replenishment of the agency stocks is an example of such
transaction.
(iv)
Goods imported by branches:
Where branches are not separate legal entities, the importation by branches
cannot be regarded as sale. Sale necessarily involves a transaction between two
separate persons. Ownership must charge.
(v) Goods imported under hire or
lease: Transactions on hire or lease do not constitute sales, even if an
option is included in the contract to purchase the goods.
(vi)
Goods supplied on loan:
Often, machinery is loaned by the owner to a customer. Such transactions do not
constitute sale.
(vii)
Goods (waste and scrap)
imported for destruction: In such transaction, the importer does not pay
for the imported goods. On the other hand, the exporter pays the importer to
accept and destroy such goods. Such transactions will also not' constitute sale
under the ACV.
Ans: Barter deals consist of an exchange
of goods or services of approximately equal value. The barter mayor may not be
settled in monetary terms. In the former case, there is no transaction value
nor any objective or quantifiable data for determining the value. Hence,
methods other than the transaction value method have to be applied. In the
latter case also where a barter transaction is expressed in monetary terms, the
same will be subject to the provisions of Article 1, paragraph l(b) of the ACV.
Here again, application of a method other than the transaction value method
will be appropriate.
Ans: Valuation of articles imported by a
passenger or a crew member in his/her baggage cannot be done using the
transaction value method when importation of baggage articles may not involve
any sale; Valuation of such goods has to be generally done using available
values for identical or similar articles.
Ans: Under the ACV, adjustments are
required to be made to take account of demonstrated difference in commercial
level and quantity in respect of:
(i) test
values;
(ii) identical goods; and
(iii) similar goods.
under Articles 1.2(b), 2.1(b) and 3.1(b) of the ACV.
Ans:
This expression occurs in Article 5 of the ACV in the context of determination
of customs value by the deductive value method. The expression mean the
greatest number of units, which are sold at a particular price. For examples,
please see the Note to Article 5 of the ACV in Appendix ll.
Ans: The expression “goods of the same
class or kind” is defined in the ACV as goods which fall within a group, or
range of goods, produced by a particular industry or industry sector, including
identical and similar goods. The expression is relevant for determination of
deductive value as well as computed value. However, in the case of deductive
value, goods imported from the same country as well as from the other countries
can be considered, whereas in the case of computed value, goods from the same
country can only be considered.
Ans: Assist is a
term used to describe any of the following goods or services supplied
free or at a reduced cost by the buyer for use in the production of the
imported goods:
a) materials, components, parts and
similar items incorporated in the imported goods;
b) tools, dies, moulds and similar items used in
the production of the imported goods;
c) materials consumed in the production
of imported goods;
d) engineering, development, ;artwork,
design work, and plans and sketches undertaken elsewhere than in the country of
importation and necessary for the production of the imported goods.
These assists are listed in Article 8.1 (b) of the ACV.
Value of such assists, apportioned as appropriate, has to be added to the
price actually paid or payable, whether these are directly supplied by the
buyer or not. At times, such assists are provided to the supplier of the
imported goods by the foreign collaborator of the buyer at the instance of the
buyer. In such cases, the price actually paid or payable to the supplier
will not include the cost of assists for which the buyer will be making
separate payments to his foreign collaborator. Therefore, such payments
are to be added, after due apportioning, to the price actually paid or payable
for the imported goods for determination of the customs value.
Ans: A buying agent acts on behalf of a buyer, finding a seller,
collecting samples, inspecting goods and in some cases arranging the transport,
insurance, storage and delivery of the goods. The amount paid to a buying agent
for his services is termed as buying commission, which is paid by the importer
in addition to paying for the goods. Article 8(1)(a)(i) of the ACV specifically
excludes buying commissions from being added to the price actually paid or
payable while determining the customs value.
Sometimes buying agents act as principals in the sense that
they use their own funds for the payment of the goods and after acquiring the
ownership they resell the goods to the ultimate buyer in the country of
importation, raising an invoice in their own names. In such cases, the
so-called buying agent become the actual seller of the goods and the sale price
would include the agent's commissions and profits. While there is a provision
in the ACV for not adding buying commission, there is no provision to permit
deduction towards buying commission in such cases.
In some cases, the buying agent may be undertaking to pay
the transport and insurance charges and including the same in his buying
commission. Such charges towards transport and insurance are to be included while
determining the customs value if the importing country has opted for CIF basis
of valuation.
The agency contract between the buyer and the agent, their
relationship, and where the agent reinvoices the buyer, the original invoice
from the seller have to be examined carefully.
Ans: A seller may lack confidence in the letter
of credit raised by the buyer on the buyer's bank for the payment to be made
for the goods sold. He/she may, therefore, seek confirmation of the letter of
credit from his/her bank or from a confirming house (a specialized commercial
house which offers such services) who provide guarantees to the seller against
the commercial risk of non-payment by the buyer or his/her bank.
The fee
charged for such services is called confirming commission. Amounts towards such
commission may have been directly included by the seller in the invoice price.
There may be cases where the seller separately invoices the buyer for the
confirming commission or the confirming institution itself directly sends an
invoice to the buyer. In such cases, confirming commissions paid by the buyer
to the seller or to a third party have to be added to the price actually paid
or payable for determining the customs value.
In some cases, a buyer may undertake on his/her own accord
to provide a seller with an irrevocable and confirmed letter of credit. For
such deals, the buyer has to pay necessary charges to the confirming institutions.
When such charges are incurred by the buyer without there being any condition
imposed in the contract for sale, such charges should not be added to the price
actually paid or payable for valuation purposes.
Ans:
Since the price actually paid or payable is the primary basis of valuation
under the ACV, actual price exclusive of trade discounts has to be taken as the
basis for determining the customs value. The following discounts can, therefore,
be allowed for deduction:
(i) Cash
discount;
(ii) Quantity discount;
(iii) Discount in kind;
(iv) Bonus for purchases exceeding certain quantity; and
(v) Special
introductory discount.
When the contract for sale provides for the following
discounts, the same may also be allowed for deduction:
(i) Late
shipment allowance;
(ii) Breakage allowance (for fragile goods);
(iii) Contractual discount (a kind of quantity discount);
(iv) Negotiated discount (special discounts justified in the
special circumstance of the sale).
There are certain other discounts that require to be
examined carefully in the light of the valuation provisions and may have to be
disallowed:
(i) Discount for brokerage: This
is a form of brokerage or commission when the sale is negotiated through a
broker. Such discounts are to be added to the invoice value. However, buying
commission is not to be added.
(ii) Cash discount given to agents of
importers in the country of importation: These are special discounts given to
sole agents, sole concessionaires etc. When the imports are by third party and
the sole agent a commission, the same is to be added to the price to determine
value. When the import is by the sole agent himself, it is to be seen whether
he is related to the supplier and the relation has influenced the price. If so,
the discount may not be allowed to be deducted. Otherwise, imports by sole
agents have to be treated under the ACV at part with any other normal imports.
(iii) Service
stocking discount: This is a discount for allowing storage facility by the
importer. This being in the nature of a compensation for some post importation
activity to be undertaken by the importer, the same may not be allowed to be
deducted. Moreover, the contract of sale has to be seen in detail to determine
whether the transaction value method is at all applicable to such a sale.
(iv) Discount
on account of loss by exchange: such discounts are at times allowed by
banks with the concurrence of shippers on account of fluctuations in exchange
rates. These are allowed through separate arrangements and are in the nature of
compensation outside the sale contract. Therefore, such discounts may not be
allowed to be deducted while determining the customs value.
Ans:
Quantity discounts are allowed by a seller according to a fixed scheme based
upon the quantity of the goods sold over a basic period. Normally these are
allowed as deductions from the price according to the quantity sold. Such
discounts are to be normally allowed while determining the customs value.
A
situation may arise where such discounts are granted retrospectively in respect
of importation already made. For example, a seller grants 5% discount on
purchases up to 100 units in a year and 10% discount if purchases exceed 100
units in a year. A buyer receives 5% discount on his first purchase of 100
units. Subsequently, he makes a second purchase of 100 more units on which he
receives 10% discount and in addition, another 5% discount retrospectively
towards the first purchase. In such a case, 5% additional discount on the subsequent
importation cannot be deducted for determining the customs value. Such amounts
are in the nature of credits in respect of earlier transactions and as such
represent part of the price already paid. Hence, such amounts have to be
included in the customs value of the second importation, being part of the
price paid or payable. As far as the first transaction is concerned, the same
has to be decided separately. In case the same was assessed provisionally, the
assessment can be reopened and the value re-determined.
Ans: There may be a financial
arrangement between the buyer and the seller under which the seller allows
deferred payment charging an extra amount towards interest. However, this
amount mayor may not be distinguished from the price payable. The ACV does not
contain any specific provision for deduction of interest. However, the WTO
Committee on Customs Valuation has adopted a Decision to the following effect,
which provides necessary guidelines:
Charges for interest
under a financing arrangement entered into by the buyer and relating to the
purchase of imported goods shall not be regarded as part of the customs value
provided that:
a) the
charges are distinguished from the price actually paid or payable for the
goods;
b) the
financing arrangement was made in writing;
c) where
required, the buyer can demonstrate that:
(i) such
goods are actually sold at the price declared as the price actually paid or
payable; and
(ii) the claimed rate of interest does not exceed the prevailing rate of
interest for such transactions at the
time when and in the country where the financing was provided.
The
above guidelines apply regardless of whether the finance is provided by the
seller, a bank or another natural or legal person. They will also apply whether
valuation is done by applying transaction value method or any other method.
The importer should be able to give a copy of the document
showing the financial arrangement. It may usually be found in the contract for
sale under the 'terms and conditions' clause. Where no such written document
exists or where the interest shown is unreasonably high, no deduction may be
allowed. It may, however, be noted that the interest rate can be higher
if financing is provided in a currency whose exchange rate is subject to high
fluctuations and therefore has a higher risk in dealing in the same.
Ans:
Warranty is a guarantee that the goods will be free from defects. It attaches
to the goods and is an integral part of the goods. Payments made for warranty
are part of the consideration paid for the goods and therefore are part of the
price actually paid or payable.
Ans: When the buyer pays a royalty or licence fees
related to the imported goods as a condition of sale, the, amount has to be
added to the price actually paid or payable. Examples are payments in respect
of patents, trademarks, copyrights etc. The basic requirement for addition of
these fees under Article 8.I(c) of the ACV are:
(i) such
amounts are related to the goods being valued; and
(ii) the buyer pays these amounts as a condition of sale of the
goods being valued.
Payments made by the buyer for the right to
distribute or resell the imported goods have to be added to the price actually
paid or payable for the imported goods only if such payments are a condition of
the sale for export to the country of importation. On the other hand, payments
for the right to reproduce the imported goods in the country of importation
should not be added to the price actually paid or payable for the imported
goods in determining the customs value.
Ans: Valuation of carrier media such as
tapes and discs for data processing equipment (computers) poses the following
problem:
(i) should the
price of the medium such as tape and disc alone be taken as the value
disregarding the cost of data or instruction (software) recorded on the same;
or
(ii) should the
price of the medium, including the cost of data and instructions recorded on
the same, be taken as the value?
The problem is peculiar
for the reason that essentially the carrier media itself (tape or disc) is
liable to duty under the customs tariff whether it is recorded or not. On the
other hand, it is the software (data or instructions) recorded on it, which is
of primary interest to the importer. In fact, in most cases the software has to
be transferred into the memory or database of the importer's own system before
the same can be used. In such a case, the medium is used only as a temporary
means of storing data. It is also possible for the buyer and the seller to
transmit and receive such software through wire or satellite, if such technical
facilities are available to them. In such cases, the question of charging
customs duty may not arise.
In view of the
peculiarity of the problem., the Committee on Customs Valuation has left the
choice to the individual countries as to whether they should include the cost
of software in the customs value or not . It has further opined that both
methods of valuation would be consistent with the ACV.
Ans: Motor vehicles may be imported,
after purchase without any use in between or they may be imported after use. In
the former case, there may not be any difficulty in using the transaction value
method Valuation of used motor vehicles can be problematic. In the case of
individual import of a vehicle which has been in the personal use of the
importer for some time prior to the import, the vehicle may have been purchased
either new or in used condition several Years back and put to additional use
thereafter. In such cases, transaction value method will not be applicable as
the vehicle to be valued after importation cannot be regarded for valuation
purposes as the same vehicle as when last sold. It will also be difficult to
find transaction values of identical or similar vehicles. Even deductive value
method can rarely be applied to such individual imports. In most cases,
therefore, recourse has to be taken to the fallback method under which
reasonable means consistent with valuation principles are to be adopted.
In some countries, the value of a used mototr vehicle is determined by
allowing depreciation for the period of use from the prices of new cars of
similar make, model and year of manufacture. If there are any additional
fixtures, value of the same are usually added Adjustments are also made for
freight and insurannce charges if the domestic law in the country of importa
tion requires valuation to be done on ClF basis.
Ans:
Imports of used and second-hand machinery are more common in developing
countries valuation of which can be problematic. Such machinery may be imported
after purchase without any further use in between. In such cases the
transaction value method can be applied. However. the machinery may have been
further used after the last purchase or the declared value may be doubtful. It
may not be possible to find values of identical or similar machines or to
determine value by the deductive value method. In such cases the fallback
method has to be applied in a manner consistent with the broad valuation
principles. In some countries value is determined in such cases by allowing
depreciation from the prices of new machinery for the period of use. At the
same time appropriate additions are also made for any reconditioning done and
fitments made in between.
Ans: The ACV has no special provision
for the valuation of these types of goods, imports of which are usually noticed
in developing countries. Normally. if there is no doubt about the description
of the imported material and the transaction is genuine, valuation can be done
by the transaction value method. However, at times, prime goods are
mis-declared or customs officers entertain a reasonable doubt about the truth
and accuracy of the declared value. In such cases. one of the other methods of
valuation has to be adopted. Usually it is difficult to find goods which are
identical or similar to such goods. In the case of scrap. some varieties are at
times graded according to international specifications developed by the
concerned trade associations and it may be possible to find comparable goods of
same specification. The deductive method of valuation can be used where such
goods imported by traders are resold after importation. Where no other methods
apply, recourse has to be taken to the fallback method.
Ans: There may be cases where the entire
shipment is found to be totally damaged upon importation. Normally, national
legislation provides for re-exportation abandonment or destruction of the
damaged goods without any duty liability and hence there would be no need for
valuation in such cases. There may be cases where the importer takes delivery
of goods that. Are partially damaged or goods having scrap value only. In such
cases, since the price paid or payable is not for the damaged goods, the
transaction value method is not applicable. However. if only a portion of the
goods is damaged, it may be possible to proportionately value the portion of
the undamaged goods based on the transaction value. For the damaged goods, the
value may be determined either under the deductive value methods or under the
fallback method as the other methods may not be applicable. Under the deductive
value method, the resale price may be used as the basis of valuation whereas
under the fallback method, the basis can be either a renegotiated price or the
original price reduced by an amount equal to an estimate of damage or cost of
repair or insurance settlement.
Ans: If such goods
are re-exported without any duty liability, valuation may not be necessary.
However, if such goods are retained by the buyer, valuation would be necessary.
In the case of wrongly supplied goods, transaction value method will not apply
and valuation has to be done by applying one of the other methods. In the case
of goods not conforming to the specifications in the original purchase order,
there may be situations where the seller may take steps to bring the goods into
conformity or may render some compensation to the buyer extraneous to the
goods. In such cases, it may be possible to value the goods using the
transaction value method.
Ans: The replacement goods may be
invoiced free of charge or invoiced at the original price with an arrangement
for giving credit for the original goods. In either case, the replacement goods
are to be valued at the original price. The first shipment has to be considered
separately.
Ans: For certain
types of goods. it is the trade practice to pack excess goods free of charge as
replacements for articles that may be damaged in transit. In such cases, the
sale price should be deemed to cover the total quantity shipped and no separate
value should be determined for the excess goods supplied free of charge.
Ans: Hire or leasing transactions do not
constitute sales, even if the contract allows an option to purchase the goods.
Therefore, in such cases the transaction value method cannot be applied and
recourse has to be taken to other methods of valuation.
Ans:
Normally in such cases, the national legislation may provide for duty exemption
on value in excess of the repair cost. If no such exemptions exist, the goods
exported for repairs have to be considered as assists and valuation done
accordingly.
Ans:
Split consignments relate to one transaction between the buyer and the seller
but imported through several consignments. Such cases arise in the following
instances:
(i) The goods constitute a complete industrial
plant. The consignments are split up for convenience in transport, keeping in
view the installation schedule.
(ii) The total import is of a large quantity and the
same is conveniently shipped in several consignments keeping in view the
requirement over a period of time.
(iii) The shipments are split because the
importer wants the goods delivered through different ports.
In the first case, some countries may have a provision for
charging one rate of duty for all the goods imported under a single project
import contract. There may however, be cases where the imports under a single
project contract may take a long time for completion and the duty rates
applicable may undergo a changes. In such cases, separate valuation of split
consignment becomes necessary. Separate valuation also becomes necessary for
currency conversion, as the rate of exchange applicable on the date of entry
for each split consignment is relevant. Therefore, the whole project assessment
should be done on a provisional basis apportioning the total value to each
consignment in a reasonable manner, subject to final adjustment and assessment
at the conclusion of all the imports.
In the second case, since the split consignment consist of
identical units or sets of goods of a particular quantity, valuation of each
consignment can be done easily apportioning the transaction value.
In the third case also, transaction value method can be
applied with suitable adjustments made for differences in transportation
charges to various ports.